ITSOGS

The increasing promiscuity that is raging through the halls of our legislature is anything but admirable, and before you go saying that I am choosing sides again, let me assure you that I think both sides are as bad as each another. The loose behavior that these LEADERS, (and I use the word very loosely) have been exhibiting is such a bad example for our future generation, I can only wonder what they must be thinking. From extramarital affairs, to white-house escapades to gay and lesbian scandals, the list goes on and on.

It is no wonder that these leaders have supported the gradual exclusion of Christianity in any form among the governmental agencies, because as it stands right now, I doubt very seriously whether there is one single honest Christian among them. This is not the kind of behavior that God expects from his children, and I assure you that neither is it the kind of behavior that the voters expected when they voted you into office

I realize that I am speaking in general and also including all the politicians in my statements, but it is because these same politicians are remaining silent until the truth surfaces on its own, they are in all reality simply condoning the behavior. Imagine what the future generation must be thinking and then ask yourself why America is in the state that she is in.

Twitter This

Usuario: Password:

If someone commits a crime against you, the odds are pretty certain that you will not want to congratulate that person in any way shape or form. The very fact that he went out of his (or her) way to put a hurting on or violate is grounds for terminal banishment. Yes I know I am a Christian and I should be willing to forgive, and the fact remains that I have forgiven many people who have violated me through the years and maybe one of these days I will write about it.

God loves the sinner, he does not love the sin, therefore there is no way that he would glorify the sinner for the sin that he committed. While I realize that we are mere mortals, I must also come to terms with some of the retarded decisions that we make, all in the name of the precious dollar. So we should always check the decisions that we put forward when the feelings of others might be at stake.

When a hotel in Chicago Illinois (home of President Obama) decided to promote the fact that it used to house gangsters, I guess it did not stop to consider that these same gangsters which they were glorifying may actually have murdered some people in the past. How distasteful of a decision to make, especially at the expense of the surviving victims.

Twitter This

Usuario: Password:

It you are employed by a large company, whether financial, legal or otherwise and you use their email system for anything other than business, beware that the odds of that email being “confidential” is probably slim to none. More and more companies are taking steps to ensure that the information leaving their establishment is monitored for theft or policy violations. The fact remains that these steps have actually become necessary because history has shown, employees will divulge information to “outsiders” without considering the ramifications.

My work experience never drew me close enough to company politics and maybe that was just as well, because I doubt I would have adjusted well to it. I am of the opinion that, employees should refrain from using company technology for their own personal use, unless of course they have the full backing of the company that they work for. Even in a situation where the company I worked for was approving my use of their technology, I would probably not do so, but then again, that’s just me.

From a company’s stand point, I can see where they are coming from. They are responsible to ensure that the company stays afloat, with its employees in mind, and also protecting itself from its competitors. Depending on the size of the company, I would not envy its security detail, because the use of email has become so popular these days.

Twitter This

Usuario: Password:

I have been to Walt Disney several times and actually had annual passes to all the parks for two separate years, I always found my experiences there as clean and friendly. Walt Disney catered for children of all ages and he got them. His parks kept improving every year and you would probably not visit them two years in a row without experiencing a new ride or exhibition of some sort.

My favorite park was always Epcot as they catered for the bigger kids with special emphasis on technology. Being a guy myself, I could not help but get lost among the various countries that Epcot had to offer. A visit to the various countries could be done on every visit and you would never get tired of your experience. But the greatest show, without exception, was the light show that they produced at the end of every day, nothing could match it. You would have gotten your money’s worth if you saw nothing else but the famous light show.

So when I came across the tragic story of the ten-year old child that lost his life while riding his bike, I felt for the company. I know that Walt Disney would have been sad if he was alive today and received such unfortunate news. I feel that Walt Disney had a special place in his heart for all the children, and it showed in his theme parks, the unfortunate accident of this child would have cut right through his heart. My condolences go out to the family, may your child rest in peace.

Twitter This

Usuario: Password:

Judging from the many followers of the late Michael Jackson, I am not surprised that his doctor is receiving as much negative publicity as he is. The fact of the matter is that the good doctor was responsible for the administering of medication to the pop singer, therefore it stands to reason that the buck would stop at him. Not so fast though, I am not convinced that the entire blame should be placed squarely on his shoulders, after all, he did not force feed Mr. Jackson anything did he?

We need to remember that Michael Jackson was accustomed to having things his own way for one thing and also Doctor Murray was acting as his personal physician, therefore it would have been a matter of, what Michael wants, Michael gets. You could probably argue that the doctor should have refused to administer the medication to Michael Jackson, but where would that have left him, probably back to his own personal profession and I can almost guarantee that the money he was being paid through the Jackson opportunity, was probably much easier to come by.

No, I don’t see this as the Doctor’s sole responsibility, especially as he was not JUST the attending physician, but rather under the employ by Michael Jackson as his own personal physician, big difference I think. But of course I have nothing to do with the whole legal process that Doctor Murray is getting himself into.

Twitter This

Usuario: Password: